Vital clues to coral reef recovery have been identified in a research project in which three scientists built 30 coral reefs from hundreds of tonnes of rock and gravel.
Working in a shallow, sandy area of Kimbe Bay, Papua New Guinea, the team from the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies constructed their artificial reefs to find out whether it is possible to rescue a damaged coral reef from obliteration and restore its richness.
"When a reef suffers a heavy impact— such as a storm or outbreak of coral bleaching—there are two different effects on the coral habitat," explains Dr Mary Bonin. "First, a lot of the habitat that was once available to fish is totally lost. And second, the habitat that still remains is often fragmented, or broken up into smaller patches.
"We wanted to figure out if the increased habitat patchiness is actually a problem for coral reef fishes, or whether it is really the loss of habitat that causes fish to decline following an impact."
With colleagues Professor Geoff Jones and Dr Glenn Almany, Bonin set out to construct 30 real-life coral reefs in an open sandy area where there were no natural reefs nearby. Each 'reef' was constructed from boulders and coral debris, carted manually from the shore in a six-metres boat, crowned with a square metre of living bottlebrush coral and stocked with 20 small blue and yellow damselfish. After a time it acquired richer diversity, as baby fish came in on the current and settled.
The scientists then simulated the effects of habitat loss – the sort of colossal damage that reefs suffer during a bad bleaching event or cyclone – habitat fragmentation, where the existing reef is broken into smaller fragments, and a combination of the two.
"As you'd expect, the effects of a loss of 75 per cent of the habitat were awful. With most of their home gone, the fish just disappeared," said Bonin. "But when we divided some of the reefs into three separate parts we found that fish survival and diversity actually improved for a time.
"We think this is because a fragmented or patchy habitat reduces the competition between fishes, creating more room for the weaker ones or for newcomers to settle. When the habitat is just a single patch, the tough guys will tend to dominate the whole area and drive the others away."
The research findings challenge the widely held view that habitat fragmentation always leads to a dramatic loss of fish numbers and diversity.
"Our findings suggest that it is actually habitat loss that is the major problem for coral reef fishes following an impact," said Bonin. "It is certainly the case that in the small areas we created and studied, you get a positive effect on fish numbers and diversity from habitat fragmentation – whereas habitat loss of 75 percent or more is a disaster."
Because fragmentation can bring greater diversity, there may be things that reef managers can do to restore badly damaged coral communities by mimicking its effects. The fact that habitat patchiness can have a positive effect on fish diversity is really exciting because it means that even if it isn't possible for managers to restore an entire coral reef, it will still be highly beneficial to restore small patches of habitat."
Even in Australia's well-managed Great Barrier Reef zone most of the coastal fringing corals have been lost. The question is whether they could gradually be restored over time, providing human impacts from the land are also reduced.