A houseboat leaving lock six on the Murray River near Morgan, South Australia Pixabay/Clarko1959
Marine Infrastructure

COLUMN | Australia's canal prosperity: identifying opportunities for inland water transport [An Innocent Australian]

Stuart Ballantyne

One of life’s great pleasures is river cruising, and if you manage to indulge yourself in this experience, for instance in the Danube–Rhine voyage between the Black Sea and the North Sea, you will be fascinated by the generated economic activities to all communities along this waterway system.

The Main (pronounced "mine") Canal, a 160-kilometre connection linking the Rhine and Danube Rivers to develop regional trade, was first attempted by the ruler Charlemagne in 793. This was followed 1,100 years later in 1846, by Ludwig I, the ruler of Bavaria, and eventually completed.

However, the 100 locks designed for small vessels making small vertical changes in heights above sealevel, were soon made redundant by the emerging road and rail systems.

The new canal, for longer and wider vessels, started in 1960. Despite setbacks, it was completed in 1992, opening up a trans-European freight route and setting the stage for the development of river cruising for the region.

Who would believe that 15,000 vessels are now employed here, including 410 river cruise vessels, with a total of 61,000 beds (the equivalent capacity of 102 medium-size hotels of 300 bedrooms each)? This alone generates €13 billion (US$15 billion) annually.

These passenger vessels are generally a standard 190-passenger design of 135 metres in length and 11.45 metres wide, to neatly fit into the many 12-metre wide locks with only two metres draught. More importantly, 5.7 metres of limiting air draught to fit underneath the lowest of the hundreds of road and rail bridges has created innovative designs of wheelhouses and wing control stations that lower themselves into the space below.

The maximum height above sea level is 406 metres at the Hilpoltstein Lock in Germany. The cargo vessels in this system, generate €8 billion (US$9 billion) in trade and carry 300 million tonnes annually, including bulk minerals, grain and containers taking just 10 days to go from the North Sea to the Black Sea, some 1,136 nautical miles.

Would it be time that Australia took another long look at national water transportation and its prosperity potential?

The sea distance from Holland to the Black Sea via the rough waters of the Atlantic and Mediterranean and passing Istanbul is 3,330 nautical miles or 14 days for the same size small coasters of 3,500 tonnes capacity.

The US, Canadian, Russian and Chinese river systems also instigate significant trades, which generate prosperity all along their canal and river systems.

Australia had a mild skirmish with locks on the Murray River 130 years ago, but small thinking at the time saw the build of small locks and small lift heights, which only achieved 36 metres above sea level for small vessels, though the rapidly expanding road and rail network, had canal/river systems eventually consigned to the “too hard basket coffin”.

The coffin has since been well and truly nailed down by an avalanche of environmental rules and regulations against dredging, or miniscule messing of waterways and anything within two to three kilometres.

The mighty Murray River, with 970 kilometres of navigable waterways, has never had the river mouth engineered for safe navigation, such as Lakes Entrance and the Gold Coast.

The South Australia Government should be ashamed of themselves. The other 132 previous river ports that helped establish transportation in the early settler days around the nation are no longer navigable because of green tape and the demonisation of dredging.

Bob Katter pushed the idea of Queensland waterways whilst he was a Minister in the Joh Bjelke Petersen Government.

Even a recent 2019 transportation study paid by the Palaszczuk Government to appease the Katter Party verified that waterways offered a positive way forward to unlock economically trapped mineral resources in Queensland. This “entrapment” is defined by the cost of extracting the minerals, loading it on to a truck, then loading it onto a train, then loading it on to a ship, for a price cheaper than you can sell it.

Given that the technology of lock systems now include eco-locks that use 60 per cent less water compared to traditional locks, and vertical lock changes of 25 metres is normal, would it be time that Australia took another long look at national water transportation and its prosperity potential? For sure, if the Chinese invade, it will be number one on their agenda. They are good at canals!

While there may be little or no appetite for such a canal cruise within Australia, the economics of bulk freight alone would justify such an investment.

How about something not as grand as the North Sea to Black Sea system of 2,100 kilometres, but a simple exercise of a 1,700-kilometre navigable canal joining the Gulf of Carpentaria, passing by Burketown and Mount Isa and straight to Port Augusta? At the halfway point, near Birdsville, you could run another canal directly to Brisbane.

On April 23, 2017 when North Korean leader Kim Jong-un threatened Australia for aligning with the US, and that, “his missiles were within striking distance of Australia”, my coffee group pals of the MTG wrote to Kim suggesting a line of ICBM strikes along this route. We even offered a hot date with a Greens Senator who had already orchestrated the blowing up of the Port Augusta coal-fired power station. Alas, the Supreme Leader did not respond.

If you take the time to study the huge mineral wealth on these proposed routes, the topography of what I am suggesting, you would have a zig-zag canal in a south-south-westerly direction, passing west of Mount Isa at a peak height of 266 metres above sea level.

This would provide a very useful port for the export of lead and zinc to Port Pirie and Asia, as well as an export pathway for the 1.2 billion tonnes of phosphate, particularly since those tenements in the Georgina Basin across Queensland and the Northern Territory remain unmined. This is a no-brainer!

There are ample studies on the significant fish habitat growth of the Rhien-Main-Danube waterway to placate the inevitable screams of the activists. Strict environmental standards in canals in Amsterdam, Venice, and Panama ensure that these waterways are always kept healthy.

The cost of waterway transportation is around three to five per cent that of road transport, with corresponding levels of emissions. While there may be little or no appetite for such a canal cruise within Australia, the economics of bulk freight alone would justify such an investment.

Such a bold project requires a government with vision. Do we have such a government with Albo?

Not a chance!